Somewhere in the firmament sits a pantheon that comprises the greatest football gods to have ever graced the face of the earth. When not roaming around on the heavenly pitch, they can be found congregated around celestial tables, gushing about their playing days (tough and principled) and lamenting on the current state of the game (soft and unscrupulous).
Of a first table would-be holy trinity, Messi, having already compiled five of the greatest club seasons in history, has unquestionably the most glistening domestic résumé. This is partly due to today’s “Europeanization” of club football: rich European top-flight leagues able to procure the best talent, which creates a European-only standard by which elite club players are now judged on.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
But what has kept La Masia graduate Messi from joining Pelé and Maradona at the first table is the international portfolio. As a 17-year-old wunderkind at the 1958 World Cup, Pelé tallied the lone goal in the quarterfinal, a hat-trick in the semifinal, and two more goals in the final. To be sure, Brazil had an all-conquering team: more than half of its starters made the 11-man World Cup all-star squad (including fellow all-time great Garrincha); and indeed, Brazil went on to capture the 1962 Cup without an injured Pelé for the latter two-thirds of the tournament.
Maradona partook in four World Cups, with his apotheosis coming in 1986, when he carried Argentina to the trophy by scoring two of the most memorable goals in football history—the “Hand of God” and the “Goal of the Century”—in the quarterfinal, adding two more in the semifinal and providing the winning assist in the final.
Last year’s World Cup and, to an extent, this year’s Copa América, were Messi’s acid tests for whether he ascends to the first table. And after the first three weeks of the Cup, he was on track to pass with flying colors, as he single-handedly dragged his team—à la Maradona in 1986—through the group stages, and played a major part in Argentina’s first two knockout victories. But alas, in the two biggest matches of his career, the semifinal and the final of the World Cup, Messi, unlike his would-be peers at the first table, was far from his scintillating best and failed to haul his team across the finishing line.
Fast forward 12 months, and the same sequence unfolded at the Copa America. Reverting to his brilliant best in shepherding Barcelona to an unprecedented second treble after (by his lofty standards) two sub-par campaigns, Messi sought the Copa as the capstone to one of the finest football seasons in history—as well as to his “first table” credentials. But after blazing Argentina’s trail to the final—without even having to net a single goal from open play—his influence dipped noticeably in his team’s final loss to hosts Chile.
Thus, Messi’s provisional place at the table of immortals, which seemed assured on the eves of the Cup and the Copa finals, have both been subsequently recalled—much like Zinédine Zidane’s following the 2006 World Cup final.
Can Messi be considered the best of all-time without a World Cup in his resume?
Were Pele and Maradona better than Messi? I’d love to hear your views. Share your comments with our community in the box below.